DIKW is just human artifact, let's move to Nature Knowledge

[Md Santo]

DIKW is just human artefact. The real Knowledge generated not from DIKW continuum but from Nature Knowledge continuum representing our smart, psycho-somatic, complex (adaptive) system and animate Universe. The paradigm needed, assuming Consciousness is the attribute of Knowledge, …“The Universe or the Nature Knowledge is the source and center of Consciousness” not anymore “Mind Brain or Human Being is the source and center of Consciousness” ( http://bit.ly/wx9NjD  - “Human Consciousness – Definition and relationship with Nature Knowledge” )

We come up to the table and solution at URL http://bit.ly/s9ZNqR (“Basic structure of Human System Biology-based Knowledge Management (HSBKM) model framework”) and giving KM a new view considering that “We are KM-regulated by nature and by nature we are KM model” through URL http://bit.ly/wQj0qE (Brief Guide to Physics of the Universe : Knowledge Management Generated )

[Md Santo]

Reply / Comment from Linkedin Group discussion under the same topic / title : “DIKW is just human artifact, let's move to Nature Knowledge”

 

Albert Simard • DIKW may be a human artifact, but as Snowden stated, humans have trouble dealing with continua, so that classification is very helpful to categorize content so that a limited set of appropriate measures can be used for managing each type. Although certain functions are common to the three major forms of content (I make no attempt to manage wisdom) the techniques for capturing, orgaizing, storing, and providing access to data, information, and knowledge are different. Therein lies the primary utility of the classification scheme.

 

Md Santo • CHOSING PARADIGM OF KNOWLEDGE IS NOT WITHOUT IMPACT
Sorry, it is not dealing with classification – categorization – taxonomy – metadata management whatsoever. It is concerned with the very basic of the paradigm on Consciousness as the attribute of Knowledge. It is the matter of chosing paradigm of Knowledge ...“The Universe or the Nature Knowledge is the source and center of Consciousness” or “Mind Brain or Human Being is the source and center of Consciousness” ?

The first related with Knowledge considered behaving as subject, evolved as emergent property within complexity, active and having consciousness. The second treating Knowledge just as object, pasive, exist with no consciousness. The first paradigm viewing the existence of Knowledge through evolvement mechanism (we use the terms “interaction of nine Knowledge Interfaces” - http://bit.ly/uH9DCA - “Basic structure of Human System Biology-based Knowledge Management (HSBKM) model framework and the development”) that are psychological phenomenon. The terms Knowledge created, capturing, organizing, storing etc we use for administrative or codifying purposes where Knowledge considered as object within second paradigm

Choosing one option between two paradigms of Knowledge is not without impact especially in practising KM moreover at the current time of evolution in Science and Technology where the role of Knowledge becoming prominent as the backbone in decision making management shifting the roles of Data-Information (DI) - http://bit.ly/pKAO8U - “KM model framework by Nature”